广告赞助
广告赞助
开云体育
今日摘要:保持更新频率,标题清晰、图片规范。

曝沙特欲1亿签青木,若成交曼联坐收3700万!但还需给另一队分成(据称沙特砸1亿求购青木,成交曼联可进账3700万,仍需与另一队分成)

提示:图片使用统一比例可减少 CLS。

heus

Providing transfer details

The user's question isn't clear, but they may want details like which Saudi club is involved, the sell-on percentages, and the timeline. I can't browse the internet, and my knowledge is limited to information available until October 2024. Since the user's date is December 27, 2025, I need to note that things might have changed. Based on what I know, Greenwood was sold to Marseille in 2024 for around €31 million, with a sell-on clause of 40-50%. If a Saudi club offers €100 million, Marseille would owe that sell-on amount, meaning €40-50 million.Clarifying sell-on clause details

I've come across varying reports about the sell-on clause for Greenwood, with some stating up to 50% while others indicate a range of 20-50%. It seems that Manchester United may receive a percentage of the profit rather than the total fee, as is often the case in such deals. The Marseille deal is said to involve a significant sell-on, likely around 50%. There's also some confusion over the headline figure of €37 million, which might suggest a 37% sell-on. Additionally, it’s possible Marseille may owe Getafe something due to their prior loan arrangement.Analyzing the Greenwood transfer situation

The headline indicates that a Saudi club wants to sign Greenwood for €100 million, meaning Manchester United would receive approximately €37 million. However, there’s confusion about whether United needs to pay another team a share of that sum. The mention of "solidarity payments" suggests the buyer typically compensates the clubs that developed the player, not the seller, which in this case would be Man United. The article might inaccurately imply that Marseille owes another club a share of the transaction, but Greenwood never played there.Explaining potential transfer scenarios

Another possibility for "另一队" might be referring to the selling team in Riyadh. Given the uncertainty around this topic, I think a clear explanation of the typical structure is best. As of my last update in October 2024, Greenwood is with Marseille, and Manchester United reportedly included a sizable sell-on clause of around 40-50%. If the sale amount is €100 million, United would receive €40-50 million, but FIFA solidarity rules could reduce that. Solidarity payments would likely go to Greenwood's youth clubs, primarily Manchester United and possibly one like Idle Juniors, but it seems unlikely that "另一队" refers to them.Breaking down Greenwood's transfer rumors

I’m considering the possibility of rumors linking Greenwood to "罗马" and thinking about how to clarify the situation for the user. I should ask them if they want a quick breakdown of what's true and what's rumor, especially about the sell-on clauses.

As of my last reliable info, Greenwood transferred to Marseille in July 2024 for around €31-34 million, plus a substantial sell-on clause of 40-50%. If a Saudi club bids €100 million, Manchester United would get €40-50 million based on that percentage.

The mention of "另一队" likely refers to the 5% FIFA solidarity payments to clubs that trained Greenwood, which United would actually receive and not pay. I’ll outline some sell-on scenarios for clarity, such as the earnings Man U would see at different percentages, and then suggest that we treat unconfirmed info as rumors. Finally, I’ll ask the user if they want me to track reliable updates.

快速拆解这条传闻,给你几个关键信息和算账口径:

  • 球员与条款现状:格林伍德在 2024 年夏天已从曼联转会至马赛,转会费约 3100–3400 万欧,曼联保留了“很高”的二次转会分成(多家权威报道称为40%–50%的二转分成,是否按“总额”还是“利润”各媒说法不一,官方未公开)。

    ![riosf](/assets/images/9030591.jpg)
  • 若沙特报价 1 亿欧:

    • 若为“按总额”的二转分成:
      • 50%:曼联约收 5000 万欧;
      • 40%:曼联约收 4000 万欧。
    • 若为“按利润”的二转分成(假设马赛买入价 3200 万欧):
      • 利润约 6800 万欧,20%利润分成则是约 1360 万欧;40%利润分成为约 2720 万欧。媒体更常提到的是“按总额”的高比例分成,所以这只是备用口径。

  • “曼联坐收3700万”的可能来源:

    • 近似于“40%总额分成(4000万)扣除FIFA 团结金(最高5%)等杂项后的估算”,或报道里提到的具体比例恰好在约 37% 左右。没有官方合同文本,具体数字只能按媒体口径估算。
  • “还需给另一队分成”怎么理解:

    • 常见的“另一队分成”其实是FIFA 团结金(最多按转会费 5%,由买方支付并按球员12–23岁培养年限分配给训练过他的俱乐部)。这笔钱通常会让卖方实际到手略低于名义转会费,但不属于曼联再往外分给某队。
    • 除非马赛与其他前东家(不含曼联)有额外约定,否则不存在曼联再把自己的二转分成“再分给第三队”的典型场景。格林伍德的已知职业履历也没有这类已公开的再分成条款。
  • 结论:1 亿报价属传闻阶段时,能确定的是曼联确实埋了很高的二转分成;若成交,曼联大概率能拿走约 40%–50%区间的分成(按总额的说法更常见),至于具体到“3700万”要看合同细节与是否以净额口径计算。

  • 需要我按你指定的分成口径(总额/利润、比例、是否扣团结金)给出不同报价的快速对照表吗?